🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.9/5 from 801+ reviews
Womenβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

GISELLE - traditional ankle boots - cherry

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.9 out of 5(801 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$144.99
$241.65
Sale
βœ“ gratis shipment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Shoe tip : PointedHeel type : Block heelFastening : ZipPattern : PlainArticle number : VA111N0HA-G11

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift fulfillment
↩️
hassle-complimentary Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

GISELLE - timeless ankle boots - cherry

Shoe tip : Pointed
Heel type : Block heel
Fastening : Zip
Pattern : Plain
Article number : VA111N0HA-G11​

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Women products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 64371

Category: Women > Shoes > Ankle boots

Original Price:$241.65 USD

Sale Price:$144.99 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

βœ“ no-cost distribution on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.9
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 801 reviews
KG
Kevin Green βœ“ Verified
1 month ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
splendid GISELLE - traditional ankle boots - cherry!
Personally, the GISELLE - retro ankle boots - cherry feels solid and it meets expectations.
JM
Jessica Moore βœ“ Verified
2 months ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
supreme Purchase Ever
The GISELLE - timeless ankle boots - cherry is well worth the price.
JB
James Brown βœ“ Verified
4 weeks ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
superb Value for Money
At first, the GISELLE - timeless ankle boots - cherry does its job and it meets expectations.
EY
Elizabeth Young βœ“ Verified
2 months ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fabulous GISELLE - timeless ankle boots - cherry!
From my experience, the GISELLE - retro ankle boots - cherry performs as expected so I’m okay with it.

LJ
Lisa Johnson βœ“ Verified
2 months ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exactly What I Needed
In daily use, the GISELLE - retro ankle boots - cherry works well enough and it works for me. Works fine so far.